Mitchell v. Mitchell

249 S.W.3d 847, 98 Ark. App. 47, 2007 Ark. App. LEXIS 93
Court of Appeals of Arkansas·Decided February 14, 2007·No. CA 06-578·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Susan Marie Mitchell appeals the circuit court’s December 2005 order on various post-divorce disputes. We dismiss her appeal without prejudice for lack of an appealable order. In its order, the circuit court reserved a ruling on whether Timothy Gene Mitchell owed child support based on a stock option he allegedly received. Because the order did not resolve all the disputed issues, and the circuit court did not certify it pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the order is not final and we lack jurisdiction to review it. Ark. R. App. P. - Civ. 2(a); Hambay v. Williams, 335 Ark. 352, 353, 980 S.W.2d 263, 264 (1998).

Dismissed without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. Mitchell, 249 S.W.3d 847, 98 Ark. App. 47, 2007 Ark. App. LEXIS 93 (Ark. Ct. App. 2007).

249 S.W.3d 847 (Mitchell v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon Pockrus v. Victoria Morris
2020 Ark. App. 364 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2020)
John v. Bolinder
2016 Ark. App. 357 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2016)
Massanelli v. Massanelli
2016 Ark. App. 90 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2016)