Mitchell v. Mead

46 So. 58, 92 Miss. 596
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Whiteield, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mead obtained judgment before a - justice of the peace in Harrison county against Levy, whereupon a writ of garnishment was issued commanding the appellant to appear and answer as to his alleged indebtedness to said Levy on December 20, 1902. On that day the case was continued to January 3, 1903, and on the latter day appellant, garnishee, failing to appear and answer, judgment by default was taken against him, and he appealed within five days to the next (May) term of the circuit court of Harrison county. Before that term convened, and on April 28, 1903, the garnishee filed his answer to‘the writ of garnishment, admitting an indebtedness of $7.50 and ten[598]*598dered that amount into court. No further steps whatever were taken in the case until December, 1906, more than three'years afterwards, when, upon motion, the court struck the answer of the appellant, garnishee, from the files and rendered a judgment against garnishee for the full amount of the claim of Mead against Levy. Manifestly this action was wrong.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, and the court below instructed to reinstate the garnishee’s answer.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. Mead, 46 So. 58, 92 Miss. 596 (Mich. 1908).

46 So. 58 (Mitchell v. Mead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Mallett
57 So. 548 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)