Mitchell v. Loyen

Fourth Circuit

Mitchell v. Loyen

412 F. App'x 630

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2011·No. No. 10-2240·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danita Mitchell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mitchell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Mitchell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danita Mitchell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mitchell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Mitchell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mitchell v. Loyen, 412 F. App'x 630 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

412 F. App'x 630 (Mitchell v. Loyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.