Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete

513 So. 2d 668, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8881

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 1987·No. No. BN-400·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alfonzo Mitchell suffered an industrial injury on August 13, 1984. Appellant appeals from a worker’s compensation order which denied his claim for temporary total disability and temporary partial disability benefits and payment of medical bills. We find the order inadequate to explain the extensive medical evidence in this record, and therefore inadequate to provide this court a basis for appropriate review. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of a more definitive order regarding the deputy’s implicit rejection of the medical testimony.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a proper order.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alfonzo Mitchell suffered an industrial injury on August 13, 1984. Appellant appeals from a worker’s compensation order which denied his claim for temporary total disability and temporary partial disability benefits and payment of medical bills. We find the order inadequate to explain the extensive medical evidence in this record, and therefore inadequate to provide this court a basis for appropriate review. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of a more definitive order regarding the deputy’s implicit rejection of the medical testimony.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a proper order.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete, 513 So. 2d 668, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8881 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

513 So. 2d 668 (Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related