Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete

513 So. 2d 668, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8881

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 1987

DocketNo. BN-400

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 513 So. 2d 668 (Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Littrell Concrete, 513 So. 2d 668, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8881 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alfonzo Mitchell suffered an industrial injury on August 13, 1984. Appellant appeals from a worker’s compensation order which denied his claim for temporary total disability and temporary partial disability benefits and payment of medical bills. We find the order inadequate to explain the extensive medical evidence in this record, and therefore inadequate to provide this court a basis for appropriate review. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of a more definitive order regarding the deputy’s implicit rejection of the medical testimony.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a proper order.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alfonzo Mitchell suffered an industrial injury on August 13, 1984. Appellant appeals from a worker’s compensation order which denied his claim for temporary total disability and temporary partial disability benefits and payment of medical bills. We find the order inadequate to explain the extensive medical evidence in this record, and therefore inadequate to provide this court a basis for appropriate review. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of a more definitive order regarding the deputy’s implicit rejection of the medical testimony.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a proper order.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 So. 2d 668, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-littrell-concrete-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack