Mitchell v. Lee

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Mitchell v. Lee

77 A. 1134, 106 Me. 555, 1910 Me. LEXIS 49

DecidedJune 10, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A. 1134 (Mitchell v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Lee, 77 A. 1134, 106 Me. 555, 1910 Me. LEXIS 49 (Me. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Assumpsit on an unwitnessed promissory note to which- the defendant pleaded the statute of limitations. The note matured more than six years prior to the date of the writ but the plaintiff claimed that certain rocks and oats were delivered to him by the defendant within the six [556]*556years, the value of which was by agreement to be allowed on the note. The defendant admitted the delivery and agreement but contended that the same took place seven years before the suit. Verdict for plaintiff for $253.10. Defendant filed a general motion for a new trial. Overruled.

George II. Worster, for plaintiff. Bertram L. Smith, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assumpsit on an unwitnessed promissory note to which- the defendant pleaded the statute of limitations. The note matured more than six years prior to the date of the writ but the plaintiff claimed that certain rocks and oats were delivered to him by the defendant within the six [556]*556years, the value of which was by agreement to be allowed on the note. The defendant admitted the delivery and agreement but contended that the same took place seven years before the suit. Verdict for plaintiff for $253.10. Defendant filed a general motion for a new trial. Overruled.

George II. Worster, for plaintiff. Bertram L. Smith, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A. 1134, 106 Me. 555, 1910 Me. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-lee-me-1910.