Mitchell v. Jewell Davis Cleaning Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mitchell v. Jewell Davis Cleaning Corp.

150 A.D.2d 656, 543 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6927

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 22, 1989·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), entered December 2, 1987, which, upon a jury verdict, on the issue of liability in favor of the defendants, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s determination that the defendants were not negligent was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence and, hence, will not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Moreover, the plaintiffs’ challenges to certain of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings and portions of the jury instructions are without merit. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), entered December 2, 1987, which, upon a jury verdict, on the issue of liability in favor of the defendants, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s determination that the defendants were not negligent was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence and, hence, will not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Moreover, the plaintiffs’ challenges to certain of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings and portions of the jury instructions are without merit. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Mitchell v. Jewell Davis Cleaning Corp., 150 A.D.2d 656, 543 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

150 A.D.2d 656 (Mitchell v. Jewell Davis Cleaning Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related