Mitchell v. Hudson
This text of 626 F. App'x 55 (Mitchell v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Paul A, Mitchell appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint in part and transferring the remaining claims to the, Eastern District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Hudson, No. 3:15-cv-00406-JAG (E.D.Va. July 29, 2015). We further deny Mitchell’s motion for a restraining order.
AFFIRMED.
To the extent that Mitchell seeks to disqualify Chief Judge Traxler from this appeal, because Chief Judge Traxler has had no involvement in this appeal, we deny the motion as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
626 F. App'x 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-hudson-ca4-2015.