Mitchell v. Hewitt
This text of 13 Miss. 361 (Mitchell v. Hewitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Writ of error to Adams county circuit court.
This is. a suit upon a promissory note for $468 10, payable “ in the currency of the state of Mississippi.” Defendant filed the plea of non assumpsit and two special pleas. Plaintiff joined issue in the plea of non assumpsit, and filed a demurrer to the special pleas, which was confessed by defendant, who also withdrew his pleas, and proffered judgment of respondeat ouster. Defendant then filed a plea of tender, “in the notes of the Mississippi Railroad Company,” to which the plaintiff filed his special demurrer.
Properly speaking, the term “ currency of the state of Mississippi,” can only mean that which has been declared to be a legal tender, because currency implies lawful money. Wheaton et al. v. Morris et al. 1 Dall. 133. In a suit for lawful money, paper money, unless shown to be a legal tender, will not be permitted to be brought into court. It does not appear that the notes of the Mississippi Railroad Company are a legal tender, or that, on the [367]*367face of the note, the contract refers to such money. Shelby v. Boyd et al. 3 Yeates, 321.
The judgment of the court below is therefore- reversed, the demurrer to the plea sustained, and judgment directed to be entered up against the defendant for the amount of the note, its interest, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Miss. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-hewitt-miss-1845.