Mitchell v. Greenough
This text of 100 F.2d 1006 (Mitchell v. Greenough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In his petition for rehearing the appellant contends for the first time that the controlling statute of limitations is sec. 159, par. 2 of Remington’s Revised Statutes of Washington, which fixes a period of-three years, and claims that his action is brought within that period. A party cannot on petition for a rehearing shift his position. Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. Bertino, 8 Cir., 82 F.2d 945; Moss v. Sherburne, 1 Cir., 11 F.2d 579; Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corp., 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 285.
In view of the fact that we adhere to our conclusion that the complaint does not state a cause of action it is unimportant whether the claim is barred.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 F.2d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-greenough-ca9-1939.