Mitchell v. Goings

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana
DecidedAugust 17, 2022
Docket2:20-cv-01333
StatusUnknown

This text of Mitchell v. Goings (Mitchell v. Goings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Goings, (E.D. La. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

GATOR MITCHELL CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NUMBER: 20-1333

SGT. ROBERT GOINGS, ET AL. SECTION: “R”(5) ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay All Possible Briefing Deadlines, and/or to Dismiss Repetitive Motion Until DthEeN SIcEhDeduling Conference is Had. (Rec. doc. 102). For the following reasons, the motion is . Plaintiff asks the Court to stay all briefing deadlines until after the Scheduling Conference is held on August 16, 2022. Currently pending before the Court, however, are three motions to dismiss (Rec. docs. 95, 97, and 98) and one motion for summary judgement 103), three of which are scheduled for submission on the briefs on August 17, 2022. A district court hasL abnrdoiasd v .d Nis. cArmet. iCoon. to stay proceedings in the interest of justice and to control its docket. , 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). “Proper use of this authority ‘calls for the exerciWsee dogf ejwudogrtmhe vn. tF, iwbrheibcho amrdu sCto rwpe.igh competing interests and maintain an eveLna bnadliasnce.’” Nevada v. United, 7S0t6at eFs.2 Dde 5p4't1 o, f5 L4a5b (.5th Cir. 1983) (quoting , 299 U.S. at 254–55); , 227 F. Supp. 3d 696, 698 (E.D. Tex. 2017). This lawsuit was filed in 2020. It has already been to the Fifth Circuit once and remanded to this Court for consideration of the exhaustion requirement (Rec. doc. 91), which was not the basis for this Court’s dismissal of the lawsuit in the first instance. A that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, the issue on which the Fifth Circuit seeks resolution. This Court sees no reason to belabor the exhaustion requirement any further, and, in its discretion, declines to stay proceedings.

Moreover, Plaintiff appears to proceed under the belief that all motions that were pending before this Court dismissed the lawsuit in the first instance are automatically pending now due to the Fifth Circuit remand. That is not the case. All pending motions are termed (dismissed) when a lawsuit is dismissed, whether or not the non-prevailing party appeals to the Fifth Circuit. In effect, the case is closed for the purposes of this Court. The motions are not automatically pending again in the case of a remand. Without a directive from the Fifth Circuit to specifically consider a previously pending motion, which was not the case here, this Court does not re-open termed motions.

While this Court recognizes that a scheduling order has not yet been issued in this lawsmuiott sioinncse t ore dmisamndis sby the Fifth Circuit, this Court also realizes that the pending motions are , which may be ruled on at the pleading stage of any litigation to protect judicial economy and the parties’ resources. The motions to dismiss (Rec. docs. 95, 97, and 98) will remain set for submission the briefs on August 17, 2022. The motion for summary judgment (Rec. doc. 103) remains set for submission on the briefs on August 31, 2022. 17th August New Orleans, Louisiana, this day of , 2022.

MICHAEL B. NORTH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Nevada v. United States Department of Labor
227 F. Supp. 3d 696 (E.D. Texas, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mitchell v. Goings, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-goings-laed-2022.