Mitchell v. GMAC
This text of Mitchell v. GMAC (Mitchell v. GMAC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1527
WILLIE H. MITCHELL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GMAC; INTEGON INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (CA-03-56-2-FL)
Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 21, 2004
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie H. Mitchell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Carpenter Prentiss, HORHNTAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Willie H. Mitchell, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint against GMAC and Integon Insurance
Company for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Mitchell v. GMAC, No. CA-03-56-2-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mitchell v. GMAC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-gmac-ca4-2004.