Mitchell v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mitchell v. Evans

26 S.E.2d 384, 69 Ga. App. 606, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 148

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 8, 1943

Docket30031.

StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.E.2d 384 (Mitchell v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Evans, 26 S.E.2d 384, 69 Ga. App. 606, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 148 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

This is the second appearance of this case . here. (See Mitchell v. Evans, supra.) In dealing with the case on the previous occasion the court set out paragraphs 7, 8, and 9 of the answer, which had been stricken on demurrer, to which judgment no exceptions were filed. On the former trial the court admitted evidence to establish the defense which had been stricken on demurrer. In dealing with that question this court ruled as set forth in headnote 1 of the instant case. In this case (grounds 3 and 4 of the motion) the court again, over objection of the plaintiff, admitted evidence in support of the stricken allegations of the answer. The admission of this testimony was in violation of the law of the case, and for this reason the judgment is reversed. We have examined the record on which the former opinion was based, and the evidence illegally admitted on the former trial was substantially the same as that to which objection was made on the trial now under consideration. For this reason we are constrained to grant a reversal.

Under the whole record there does not appear any reversible error in special grounds 1 and 2.

Since there is likely to be another trial, and since under the pleadings and the evidence, there were issues proper for the jury to determine under the general grounds, and there being no reversible error pertaining thereto, we will not further comment on the general grounds.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

This is the second appearance of this case . here. (See Mitchell v. Evans, supra.) In dealing with the case on the previous occasion the court set out paragraphs 7, 8, and 9 of the answer, which had been stricken on demurrer, to which judgment no exceptions were filed. On the former trial the court admitted evidence to establish the defense which had been stricken on demurrer. In dealing with that question this court ruled as set forth in headnote 1 of the instant case. In this case (grounds 3 and 4 of the motion) the court again, over objection of the plaintiff, admitted evidence in support of the stricken allegations of the answer. The admission of this testimony was in violation of the law of the case, and for this reason the judgment is reversed. We have examined the record on which the former opinion was based, and the evidence illegally admitted on the former trial was substantially the same as that to which objection was made on the trial now under consideration. For this reason we are constrained to grant a reversal.

Under the whole record there does not appear any reversible error in special grounds 1 and 2.

Since there is likely to be another trial, and since under the pleadings and the evidence, there were issues proper for the jury to determine under the general grounds, and there being no reversible error pertaining thereto, we will not further comment on the general grounds.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 S.E.2d 384, 69 Ga. App. 606, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-evans-gactapp-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack