Mitchell v. Dugan Bros.
226 A.D. 685, 233 N.Y.S. 829
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the issues should have been submitted to the jury. (Manthey v. Rauenbuehler, 71 App. Div. 173; Furlong v. Winne & Mc Kain Co., 166 id. 882; Hollaran v. City of New York, 168 id. 469.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Dugan Bros., 226 A.D. 685, 233 N.Y.S. 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 685 (Mitchell v. Dugan Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manthey v. Rauenbuehler
71 A.D. 173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)