Mitchell v. David

Alabama Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. David

150 So. 563, 25 Ala. App. 560, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 181

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 31, 1933

Docket6 Div. 439.

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 563 (Mitchell v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. David, 150 So. 563, 25 Ala. App. 560, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 181 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

More might be said, but it will suffice for a disposition of this appeal to say that assignments of error 1, 2, 4, and 6, at least, do not comply with Supreme Court rule 1 (Michie’s Code 1928, p. 1928), and this court ■must decline to consider them. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. of Chattanooga, Tenn., v. Priest, 212 Ala. 576, 103 So. 678.

And that, all the assignments of error being “argued in bulk,” so that we are unable to say which is, and which is not, properly insisted upon, we cannot predicate a reversal upon any one of same. See City of Montgomery v. Moon, 208 Ala. 472, 94 So. 337; Alabama Co. v. Norwood, 211 Ala. 385, 100 So. 479.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI