Mitchell v. Cotreau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Mitchell v. Cotreau

96 A. 836, 114 Me. 554, 1916 Me. LEXIS 163

DecidedMarch 25, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 836 (Mitchell v. Cotreau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Cotreau, 96 A. 836, 114 Me. 554, 1916 Me. LEXIS 163 (Me. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

This was an action of tort to recover damages alleged to have been caused the plaintiff’s horse by the defendant’s dog. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $200.30. The case is before this court on motion. The issues were simply of fact.

A careful study of the evidence fails to convince the court that the verdict was manifestly wrong. The entry must therefore be,

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was an action of tort to recover damages alleged to have been caused the plaintiff’s horse by the defendant’s dog. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $200.30. The case is before this court on motion. The issues were simply of fact.

A careful study of the evidence fails to convince the court that the verdict was manifestly wrong. The entry must therefore be,

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A. 836, 114 Me. 554, 1916 Me. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-cotreau-me-1916.