Mitchell v. . Clarke

1 N.C. 29
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1791·Published

Opinion

Motion by Iredell for plaintiff to prove work and labor done, not by the plaintiff himself, but by negroes which he employed: and goods, etc., sold and delivered for the use of the defendant, by sundry persons and paid for by the plaintiff, under the book debt act.* (30)

Objected by Mr. Attorney-General Moore, that this is neither within the spirit nor letter of the act, because the work was not done by the plaintiff himself, etc.

But, on a long time taken up in discussing the subject, the Court overruled the objection, and admitted the plaintiff to swear.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. . Clarke, 1 N.C. 29 (N.C. Ct. App. 1791).

1 N.C. 29 (Mitchell v. . Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.