Mitchell v. Caswell
377 P.2d 911, 233 Or. 328, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 260
Opinion
In this case plaintiff alleged that defendant was indebted to plaintiff’s assignors for logging equipment [329] furnished to defendant by plaintiff’s assignors. Defendant denied the indebtedness and claimed he was engaged with the alleged creditor in a joint venture. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court found for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The evidence clearly supports the trial court’s finding that a joint venture had not existed. There is nothing further for us to decide. This appeal is without merit. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Caswell, 377 P.2d 911, 233 Or. 328, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 260 (Or. 1963).
377 P.2d 911 (Mitchell v. Caswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Thomas
573 P.2d 1259 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
DeBolt v. Cupp
528 P.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
Parker v. Gladden
407 P.2d 246 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1967)
Bonnie v. Gladden
402 P.2d 237 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1965)
Founts v. Gladden
391 P.2d 629 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)
Barnett v. Gladden
390 P.2d 614 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)
State v. Cloran
386 P.2d 913 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1963)
Womack v. Kremen
380 P.2d 815 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1963)
Jensen v. Gladden
378 P.2d 950 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1963)
Bryant v. State
378 P.2d 951 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1963)