Mitchell v. Caswell
This text of 377 P.2d 911 (Mitchell v. Caswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case plaintiff alleged that defendant was indebted to plaintiff’s assignors for logging equipment [329]*329furnished to defendant by plaintiff’s assignors. Defendant denied the indebtedness and claimed he was engaged with the alleged creditor in a joint venture. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court found for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The evidence clearly supports the trial court’s finding that a joint venture had not existed. There is nothing further for us to decide. This appeal is without merit. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
377 P.2d 911, 233 Or. 328, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-caswell-or-1963.