Mitchell v. Burnt Mountain Logging
Opinion
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that the hearings division lacked jurisdiction to review his claim for reimbursement of travel expenses that he incurred in the course of medical treatment. We review for errors oflaw, ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7), (8), and reverse.
Employer argues that ORS 656.704(3),1 and ORS 656.327(l)(a),2 grant original jurisdiction of this dispute to the Director of the Department of Insurance and Finance. However, employer did not demonstrate that it desired director review by giving the notice required by ORS 656.327-(l)(a). Without compliance with that statutory procedure, the dispute remains within the Board’s jurisdiction. Meyers v. Darigold, Inc., 123 Or App 217, 861 P2d 352 (1993).
We do not address claimant’s alternative argument that the denial of reimbursement for travel expenses does not raise a question regarding medical treatment that is subject to director review under ORS 656.327(1).
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
865 P.2d 440 (Mitchell v. Burnt Mountain Logging) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.