Mitchell v. Bradberry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mitchell v. Bradberry

1 Ga. L. Rep. 17

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 17 (Mitchell v. Bradberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Bradberry, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 17 (Ga. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Blandford, J.

While it might have been a good ground for challenging jurors in a justice’s court, before the jury had been empanelled, that the names of some of the jurors were not on the list of names of jurors furnished by the jury commissioners to the clerk of the superior court, yet where no objection was made before the trial, and no ruling •was made thereon, it cannot be taken advantage of by certiorari after verdict. Code, §5052.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandford, J.

While it might have been a good ground for challenging jurors in a justice’s court, before the jury had been empanelled, that the names of some of the jurors were not on the list of names of jurors furnished by the jury commissioners to the clerk of the superior court, yet where no objection was made before the trial, and no ruling •was made thereon, it cannot be taken advantage of by certiorari after verdict. Code, §5052.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ga. L. Rep. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-bradberry-ga-1885.