MITCHELL v. BOYLSTEIN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania·Decided December 18, 2024·No. 3:22-cv-00154·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VICTOR LLOYD MITCHELL, : Plaintiff : v. : Case No. 3:22-cv-154-KAP DON BOYLSTEIN, : Defendant : Memorandum Order Six weeks ago, in response to a motion for a stay premised on the proposed filing of alengthy motion to compel and motion for appointment of counsel, I ordered plaintiff to file “forthwith” the approximately 100 pages of the motion to compel that he said he had already compiled. ECF no. 62. Nothing has been filed, not even the 35 pages that plaintiff stated he had prepared by May 2024. See ECF no. 49. Reasonable delays, when repeated, can have a cumulative impact that impairs the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of civil matters. That point has been reached. Accordingly, no motion to compel will be considered. The final pretrial schedule is that motions for summary judgment shall be filed on or before January 31, 2025, with responses filed on or before March 3, 2025. If no motions are filed plaintiffs pretrial statement shall be filed on or before February 28, 2025, and defendant’s pretrial statement shall be filed on or before March 14, 2025. Given the history of this matter, further extensions will need to be justified by extraordinary reasons. I consider the Civil Justice Reform Act to establish a goal that ordinary civil matters should be resolved within three years of the filing of the complaint, and that mark will be reached in the coming year. I am the third judge in line to share one available courtroom in this division so my flexibility in scheduling civil trials is limited not only by the rule that criminal trials come first but also by the fact that I do not always have jurors available. Therefore, failure to timely file necessary pleadings may result in sanctions including the last-resort sanction of dismissal. See Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 747 F.2d 863, 868 (3d Cir.1984); In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VD, 718 F.3d 236, 246 (3d Cir.2013); Hildebrand v. Allegheny County, 923 F.3d 128, 132 (3d Cir. 2019). Ose DATE:_ December 18, 2024 Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge Notice by ECF to counsel and by U.S. Mail to:

Victor L. Mitchell MX-8108 S.C.I. Somerset 1590 Walters Mill Road Somerset, PA 15510

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MITCHELL v. BOYLSTEIN, (W.D. Pa. 2024).

MITCHELL v. BOYLSTEIN (MITCHELL v. BOYLSTEIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related