Mitchell v. Andrews
This text of 94 Ga. 611 (Mitchell v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Manley as agent of Mrs. Mitchell sued ’out a warrant to dispossess Andrews of certain premises in Hampton, Henry county. In the present suit Andrews alleged that said action was wrongful and malicious. The case came to this court (92 Ga. 629). It was again tried, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff'. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was overruled. The motion alleges, that the court erred in charging the jury that, under the plea of justification, the law casts upon the defendants “ the burden of showing that they had the right to procure said warrant to dispossess the plaintiff; and this they must do to your reasonable satisfaction by a preponderance of the evidence.” Also, in charging in the language of the code, §3066, and the first sentence of §3067. Also, that defendant Manley resided in Henry county, and only did what he was authorized to do ; and hence the city court of Atlanta had no jurisdiction of him. There was no plea to the jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 Ga. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-andrews-ga-1894.