Mitchell Reed Sussman v. Soleil Management, LLC

Opinion

3}} Mitchell Reed Sussman, Case No. 2:18-cv-02218-JAD-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motion for 5 Leave to Amend Soleil Management, LLC, et al., 6 [ECF Nos. 63, 100] Defendants 7 8 Defendants Club De Soleil Vacation Club and Tahiti Village Vacation Club move for leave to amend their answers so that they can assert counterclaims in this case.! Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler has thoughtfully considered the parties’ briefing and recommends that I deny the motion.” The deadline to challenge that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’ s 13] report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”* 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 15 [ECF No. 100] is ADOPTED in full and the Motion for Leave to Amend Defendants’ Answers 16 [ECF No. 63] is DENIED for the reasons stated in the R&R.* 17 Dated: November 16, 2019 18 U.S. District Jud nnifer.A/ Dorsey 19 20 ECF No. 63.

3 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 23] U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). * ECF No. 100.