Mitchell, Otis Samuel

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 19, 2020
DocketWR-91,412-01
StatusPublished

This text of Mitchell, Otis Samuel (Mitchell, Otis Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell, Otis Samuel, (Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,412-01

EX PARTE OTIS SAMUEL MITCHELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 13-10-11074(1) IN THE 359TH DISTRICT COURT FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of

aggravated kidnapping. He was sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment for the aggravated sexual

assault counts and twenty-five years’ imprisonment for the aggravated kidnapping count. The Ninth

Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Mitchell v. State, Nos. 09-15-00162-CR, 09-15-00164-

CR & 09-15-00164-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont May 4, 2016) (not designated for publication).

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district

clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his conviction

had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Based 2

on the record, the trial court has determined that appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and

that Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for counsel’s deficient

performance.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,

180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionary

review of the judgments of the Ninth Court of Appeals in cause numbers 09-15-00162, 09-15-00163-

CR, and 09-15-00164-CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he

must file it with this Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: August 19, 2020 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Crow
180 S.W.3d 135 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mitchell, Otis Samuel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-otis-samuel-texcrimapp-2020.