Mitchell & Morgan, Inc. v. Baumgart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mitchell & Morgan, Inc. v. Baumgart

16 A.D.2d 758, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 758 (Mitchell & Morgan, Inc. v. Baumgart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell & Morgan, Inc. v. Baumgart, 16 A.D.2d 758, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on September 22, 1960 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Order entered on October 13, 1960 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Order, entered on October 27, 1960, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent, but with leave to defendant to move for reconsideration upon a showing by affidavit or otherwise that the first bond did not effect the ultimate release of assets from levy or the Sheriff’s possession and upon a further showing that plaintiff was not entitled to effect a levy on any released assets under the second warrant. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on September 22, 1960 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Order entered on October 13, 1960 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Order, entered on October 27, 1960, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent, but with leave to defendant to move for reconsideration upon a showing by affidavit or otherwise that the first bond did not effect the ultimate release of assets from levy or the Sheriff’s possession and upon a further showing that plaintiff was not entitled to effect a levy on any released assets under the second warrant. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 758, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-morgan-inc-v-baumgart-nyappdiv-1962.