Mitchell, Michael Aundrey AKA JONES, MIKE

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 23, 2011
DocketWR-68,057-03
StatusPublished

This text of Mitchell, Michael Aundrey AKA JONES, MIKE (Mitchell, Michael Aundrey AKA JONES, MIKE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell, Michael Aundrey AKA JONES, MIKE, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-68,057-03
EX PARTE MICHAEL AUNDREY MITCHELL, AKA MIKE JONES, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 54,284-B IN THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to eighteen years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the affidavit counsel filed in response to the claims in the -01 application is credible. The trial court shall also make conclusions of law as to whether counsel's conduct rendered Applicant's guilty plea involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: November 23, 2011

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Lemke
13 S.W.3d 791 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mitchell, Michael Aundrey AKA JONES, MIKE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-michael-aundrey-aka-jones-mike-texcrimapp-2011.