Mitchell, L. v. Shikora, Pets.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 20, 2017·No. 190 WAL 2017 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

LANETTE MITCHELL, : No. 190 WAL 2017 :

Respondent :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

EVAN SHIKORA, D.O., UNIVERSITY OF : PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS D/B/A : WOMANCARE ASSOCIATES, MAGEE : WOMENS HOSPITAL OF UPMC, :

:

Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO Petitioners’ second issue, as stated by Petitioners:

Whether the Superior Court’s holding directly conflicts with this Honorable Court’s holdings in Brady v. Urbas, 111 A.3d 1155 (Pa. 2015), which permits evidence of general risks and complications in a medical negligence claim?

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED as to all remaining issues. Petitioners’

Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell, L. v. Shikora, Pets., (Pa. 2017).

Mitchell, L. v. Shikora, Pets. (Mitchell, L. v. Shikora, Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady, M. v. Urbas D.P.M., W., Aplt.
111 A.3d 1155 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)