Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, PLLC v. Brewer

MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, PLLC v. Brewer

707 S.E.2d 246, 365 N.C. 188, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 268
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 7, 2011·No. 87P11-1·Published

Opinion

707 S.E.2d 246 (2011)

MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, PLLC, et al.
v.
BREWER, et al.

No. 87P11-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 2011.

E.D. Gaskins, Jr., Raleigh, for Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman, PLLC, et al.

Coy E. Brewer, Jr., Pro Se, Fayetteville, for Brewer, Coy E. (Jr.).

Ronnie M. Mitchell, Fayetteville, for Mitchell, Ronnie A.

Robert E. Zaytoun, Raleigh, for Brittain, Charles, et al.

Charles Brittain, for Brittain, Charles.

Louis E. Wooten, III, Raleigh, for Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman, PLLC, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of March 2011 by Plaintiffs to Strike Response of Charles Brittain:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of April 2011."

MARTIN, J. and TIMMONS-GOODSON, J. recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, PLLC v. Brewer, 707 S.E.2d 246, 365 N.C. 188, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 268 (N.C. 2011).

707 S.E.2d 246 (MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, PLLC v. Brewer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.