Mitchell Boyd Logging & Pulpwood v. Boyd

381 So. 2d 268, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16283
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1980·No. No. QQ-404·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our interpretation of Section 440.02(2), Florida Statutes, (1975), leads us to the conclusion that an otherwise exempt employer may waive his exemption and bring himself within the protection of the Act by obtaining workmen’s compensation insurance coverage specifically securing the benefits of the chapter. Allen v. Estate of Carman, 281 So.2d 317 (Fla.1973); Strickland v. A1 Landers Dump Trucks, Inc., 170 So.2d 445 (Fla.1964). The remaining issues we find to be without merit. The order of the deputy commissioner is accordingly affirmed.

ERVIN, SHIVERS and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell Boyd Logging & Pulpwood v. Boyd, 381 So. 2d 268, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

381 So. 2d 268 (Mitchell Boyd Logging & Pulpwood v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walter Mills Logging & Pulpwood v. Mills
414 So. 2d 220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)