Mitchell, Attorney General, Et Al. v. Penny Stores, Inc.

284 U.S. 576, 76 L. Ed. 500, 52 S. Ct. 27, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 486
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 26, 1931
Docket5
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 284 U.S. 576 (Mitchell, Attorney General, Et Al. v. Penny Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell, Attorney General, Et Al. v. Penny Stores, Inc., 284 U.S. 576, 76 L. Ed. 500, 52 S. Ct. 27, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 486 (1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In this suit, brought to enjoin the

enforcement of the provisions of §§ 2 (c), 11, and 13 of article 1 of chapter 90 of the Laws of Mississippi of 1930, an application was made to the District Court of the United States for an interlocutory injunction. The District Court, composed of three judges (U. S. C., Title 28, § 380), granted an interlocutory injunction upon the giving by the plaintiffs of a bond payable to the State of Mississippi in the sum of $5,000, conditioned as required by law, restraining the enforcement of the statutory provisions until the cause could be fully heard and determined. No opinion was rendered by the District Court, and the only question'presented by the record upon this appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in granting an injunction until the case could be heard upon the merits. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338. The *577 order was made prior to the decision of this Court in State Board of Commissioners v. Jackson, 283 U. S. 527, and, as no abuse of discretion is shown, the order must be affirmed.

Mr. W. L. Guice, with whom Messrs. George T. Mitchell, Attorney General of Mississippi, and J. A. Lauderdale, Assistant Attorney General, were on- the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Wm. H. Watkins, Martin A. Schenck, Clark McKercher, Robert S. Marx, and W. H. Danñat Pell were on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deadwood, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue
572 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)
Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Commissioner
97 F.2d 272 (Third Circuit, 1938)
Munoz v. Porto Rico Ry. Light & Power Co.
83 F.2d 262 (First Circuit, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Lee
166 So. 249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. Simpson
166 So. 227 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of Portland
42 P.2d 162 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of Spartanburg
170 S.E. 273 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1933)
Penny Stores, Inc. v. Mitchell
59 F.2d 789 (S.D. Mississippi, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 U.S. 576, 76 L. Ed. 500, 52 S. Ct. 27, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-attorney-general-et-al-v-penny-stores-inc-scotus-1931.