Mitchel v. Jewel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Mitchel v. Jewel

7 Mart. 185

DecidedDecember 15, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Mart. 185 (Mitchel v. Jewel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchel v. Jewel, 7 Mart. 185 (La. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

The counsel observed, that as both the clerk and the district judge had certified that the record con[186]*186tained the whole testimony, the presumption must be that Filhiol, though sworn, was not examined.

On this, Turner, for the plaintiff and appellant,

moved for and obtained a writ of certiorari.

Thereupon, the counsel introduced the affidavit of the defendant, showing that Filhiol was examined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The counsel observed, that as both the clerk and the district judge had certified that the record con[186]*186tained the whole testimony, the presumption must be that Filhiol, though sworn, was not examined.

On this, Turner, for the plaintiff and appellant,

moved for and obtained a writ of certiorari.

Thereupon, the counsel introduced the affidavit of the defendant, showing that Filhiol was examined.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Mart. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchel-v-jewel-la-1820.