Mitcham v. Mitcham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mitcham v. Mitcham

115 A.D.2d 460, 496 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.2d 460 (Mitcham v. Mitcham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitcham v. Mitcham, 115 A.D.2d 460, 496 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions for divorce commenced in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, and a support proceeding commenced in the Family Court, Westchester County, Edgar Mitcham appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisheim, J.), entered October 30, 1984, as denied removal to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, of his Family Court proceeding for a downward modification of support and directed that the issues of maintenance and child support raised in the divorce proceeding be determined in the pending Family Court proceeding.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon this record, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing that the issues of maintenance and child support be determined in the Family Court, Westchester County. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions for divorce commenced in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, and a support proceeding commenced in the Family Court, Westchester County, Edgar Mitcham appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisheim, J.), entered October 30, 1984, as denied removal to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, of his Family Court proceeding for a downward modification of support and directed that the issues of maintenance and child support raised in the divorce proceeding be determined in the pending Family Court proceeding.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon this record, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing that the issues of maintenance and child support be determined in the Family Court, Westchester County. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 460, 496 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitcham-v-mitcham-nyappdiv-1985.