Mistrot, Thomas Marcus
This text of Mistrot, Thomas Marcus (Mistrot, Thomas Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0861-09
THOMAS MISTROT, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
VICTORIA COUNTY
Per curiam. keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals and the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc.
Delivered: September 23, 2009
Do Not Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mistrot, Thomas Marcus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mistrot-thomas-marcus-texcrimapp-2009.