Mistretta v. Town of North Hempstead

201 A.D.2d 710, 609 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1707

This text of 201 A.D.2d 710 (Mistretta v. Town of North Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mistretta v. Town of North Hempstead, 201 A.D.2d 710, 609 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), entered December 4, 1991, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint based upon the plaintiffs’ failure to meet the written notice requirements set forth in Town Law § 65-a (2) and the Town of North Hempstead Code § 26-1 (see, O’Rourke v Town of Smithtown, 129 AD2d 570). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Rourke v. Town of Smithtown
129 A.D.2d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 710, 609 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mistretta-v-town-of-north-hempstead-nyappdiv-1994.