Mister v. Corrigan
This text of 17 Mo. App. 510 (Mister v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
When this cause was submitted, by agreement of the parties and consent of the court, the appellant was given ten days in which to file his brief and statement.
Though the ten days have long since expired, there is as yet no brief or statement in behalf of appellant. It is likewise discovered, on examination, there is no assign[511]*511ment oí errors. The law absolutely requires a statement and brief, and they cannot be dispensed with even by agreement. — Dike v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418. The judgment below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Mo. App. 510, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mister-v-corrigan-moctapp-1885.