Mister v. Corrigan

17 Mo. App. 510, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 133
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 4, 1885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Ellison, J.

When this cause was submitted, by agreement of the parties and consent of the court, the appellant was given ten days in which to file his brief and statement.

Though the ten days have long since expired, there is as yet no brief or statement in behalf of appellant. It is likewise discovered, on examination, there is no assign[511] ment oí errors. The law absolutely requires a statement and brief, and they cannot be dispensed with even by agreement. — Dike v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418. The judgment below is affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mister v. Corrigan, 17 Mo. App. 510, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 133 (Mo. Ct. App. 1885).

17 Mo. App. 510 (Mister v. Corrigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharp v. Q., O. & K. C. Ry. Co.
123 S.W. 507 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)