Mister v. Corrigan

17 Mo. App. 510, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 133
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 4, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Mo. App. 510 (Mister v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mister v. Corrigan, 17 Mo. App. 510, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 133 (Mo. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ellison, J.

When this cause was submitted, by agreement of the parties and consent of the court, the appellant was given ten days in which to file his brief and statement.

Though the ten days have long since expired, there is as yet no brief or statement in behalf of appellant. It is likewise discovered, on examination, there is no assign[511]*511ment oí errors. The law absolutely requires a statement and brief, and they cannot be dispensed with even by agreement. — Dike v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418. The judgment below is affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sharp v. Q., O. & K. C. Ry. Co.
123 S.W. 507 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Mo. App. 510, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mister-v-corrigan-moctapp-1885.