Missud v. Court California

Supreme Court

Missud v. Court California

136 S. Ct. 329, 193 L. Ed. 2d 223, 84 U.S.L.W. 3195, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 6507

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 13, 2015

DocketNo. 15–5601.

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S. Ct. 329 (Missud v. Court California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Missud v. Court California, 136 S. Ct. 329, 193 L. Ed. 2d 223, 84 U.S.L.W. 3195, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 6507 (U.S. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California. Because the court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since the only qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances "the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court."

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice SCALIA, Justice KENNEDY, Justice THOMAS, and Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California. Because the court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since the only qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances "the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court."

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice SCALIA, Justice KENNEDY, Justice THOMAS, and Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S. Ct. 329, 193 L. Ed. 2d 223, 84 U.S.L.W. 3195, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 6507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missud-v-court-california-scotus-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack