Missouri Valley Life Insurance v. Kiehl

25 Kan. 390
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The principal question to be decided in this case, as is shown by the record and admitted by counsel, is: Who owns the annual crops growing on land under the following circumstances? A judgment and decree of foreclosure are rendered against the owner of the land, on a note and mortgage. Afterward, the owner sows wheat and rye upon the land. Afterward, an order of sale is issued, and the land is sold, and the sale confirmed., and a sheriff's deed is execute!! to the purchaser, who immediately takes possession of the property. Afterward, the crops mature, and are ready to be harvested.

Under such circumstances, we think the crops belong to the purchaser. This question has already been decided in this court, in the case of Smith v. Hague, ante, p. 246. The judgment of the court below in this case will therefore, upon the authority of the above decision, be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Missouri Valley Life Insurance v. Kiehl, 25 Kan. 390 (kan 1881).

25 Kan. 390 (Missouri Valley Life Insurance v. Kiehl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Lappin
79 S.W. 995 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)