Home/Supreme Court/Missouri v. Frye

Missouri v. Frye

178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1128, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 11, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 2011
DocketNo. 10-444
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 622 (Missouri v. Frye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri v. Frye, 178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1128, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 11, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “What remedy, if any, should be provided for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargain negotiations if the defendant was later convicted and sentenced pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures?”

Same case below, 311 S.W.3d 350.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. David Braxton
456 F. App'x 242 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Lloyd Maxwell v. United States
440 F. App'x 418 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
Ham v. Commissioner of Correction
23 A.3d 682 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Webb v. State
334 S.W.3d 126 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2011)
Kerr v. Thurmer
639 F.3d 315 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1128, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 11, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-v-frye-scotus-2011.