Missouri v. Frye
178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1128, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 11, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 2011·No. No. 10-444·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “What remedy, if any, should be provided for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargain negotiations if the defendant was later convicted and sentenced pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures?”
Same case below, 311 S.W.3d 350.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Missouri v. Frye, 178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1128, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 11, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397 (U.S. 2011).
178 L. Ed. 2d 622 (Missouri v. Frye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. David Braxton
456 F. App'x 242 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Lloyd Maxwell v. United States
440 F. App'x 418 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
Ham v. Commissioner of Correction
23 A.3d 682 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Webb v. State
334 S.W.3d 126 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2011)
Kerr v. Thurmer
639 F.3d 315 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)