Missouri United School Insurance Council v. Jackson R-II School District

Missouri Court of Appeals

Missouri United School Insurance Council v. Jackson R-II School District

488 S.W.3d 677, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 159, 2016 WL 720547

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102886

StatusPublished

This text of 488 S.W.3d 677 (Missouri United School Insurance Council v. Jackson R-II School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Missouri United School Insurance Council v. Jackson R-II School District, 488 S.W.3d 677, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 159, 2016 WL 720547 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackson R-II School District (the “School District”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Missouri United School Insurance Council (“MUSIC”) following a bench trial, finding that MUSIC did not owe a duty, under its policy, to defend the School District against claims (the “Petition”) ■ arising out of the School District’s contract with a third party. We [678]*678have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and we find the trial court did not err in holding that MUSIC did not owe a duty to defend the School District under the MUSIC’S policy. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Crv. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackson R-II School District (the “School District”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Missouri United School Insurance Council (“MUSIC”) following a bench trial, finding that MUSIC did not owe a duty, under its policy, to defend the School District against claims (the “Petition”) ■ arising out of the School District’s contract with a third party. We [678]*678have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and we find the trial court did not err in holding that MUSIC did not owe a duty to defend the School District under the MUSIC’S policy. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Crv. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 S.W.3d 677, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 159, 2016 WL 720547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-united-school-insurance-council-v-jackson-r-ii-school-district-moctapp-2016.