Missouri Trust Co. v. Cunningham

81 Mo. App. 262, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 395
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 1899·Published

Opinion

ELLISON, J.

The action is replevin for a standing crop of corn and judgment was for plaintiff in the circuit [263]*263court. The appeal was taken to the supreme court on the ground of constitutional question. It was transferred here as not involving such question, or, at least, that it was not raised on the record.

Plaintiff purchased the premises at a sale under provisions of a deed of trust executed prior to law of 1893 (Laws 1893, p. 210) and defendants are tenants of the grantor in the deed of trust who grew the corn after that law went into effect. The case is in all material respect like that of Walton v. Pudge, 63 Mo. App. 52, and must be governed by that case. See also Reed v. Swan, 133 Mo. 100.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Missouri Trust Co. v. Cunningham, 81 Mo. App. 262, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1899).

81 Mo. App. 262 (Missouri Trust Co. v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. Fudge
63 Mo. App. 52 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Reed v. Swan
34 S.W. 483 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)