Missouri Trust Co. v. Cunningham

81 Mo. App. 262, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 395
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 30, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 81 Mo. App. 262 (Missouri Trust Co. v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri Trust Co. v. Cunningham, 81 Mo. App. 262, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 395 (Mo. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

ELLISON, J.

The action is replevin for a standing crop of corn and judgment was for plaintiff in the circuit [263]*263court. The appeal was taken to the supreme court on the ground of constitutional question. It was transferred here as not involving such question, or, at least, that it was not raised on the record.

Plaintiff purchased the premises at a sale under provisions of a deed of trust executed prior to law of 1893 (Laws 1893, p. 210) and defendants are tenants of the grantor in the deed of trust who grew the corn after that law went into effect. The case is in all material respect like that of Walton v. Pudge, 63 Mo. App. 52, and must be governed by that case. See also Reed v. Swan, 133 Mo. 100.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walton v. Fudge
63 Mo. App. 52 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Reed v. Swan
34 S.W. 483 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Mo. App. 262, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-trust-co-v-cunningham-moctapp-1899.