Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Shipman

20 S.W. 952, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 407, 1892 Tex. App. LEXIS 80
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 29, 1892
DocketNo. 719.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 S.W. 952 (Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Shipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Shipman, 20 S.W. 952, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 407, 1892 Tex. App. LEXIS 80 (Tex. Ct. App. 1892).

Opinion

HEAD, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellee in the Justice Court for Precinct No. 1, Denton County, Texas, to recover of appellant $145 damages, alleged to have been caused him by the killing by appellant of one mare of the value of $75 and one horse of the value of $70. Judgment was rendered in favor of appellee in the Justice Court for the sum of $125, and the case was taken by appellant by appeal to the County Court, and in that court judgment was rendered in favor of appellee for the sum of $145.

There is nothing in the transcript showing what the pleadings of the parties were either in the Justice or County Court.

Article 1573 of the Revised Statutes provides that, “The pleadings in the Justice Court shall be oral, except where otherwise specially provided, but a brief statement thereof shall be noted on the docket.” Without something in the record to apprise us what the issues between the parties were, as contained in their pleadings, whether they be oral or written, it is impossible for us to pass upon errors assigned to charges given and refused, or to the admission or rejection of evidence, and we will not undertake to do so. This has long been the practice in this State. Maass v. Solingsky, 67 Texas, 290; Moore v. Jordan, 67 Texas, 394; Silberberg v. Trilling, 82 Texas, 523.

As we are unable to see from the record that appellant suffered any injury from the action of the court in the several matters complained of in its assignment of errors, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Goodman
189 S.W. 326 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Brown
175 S.W. 749 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.W. 952, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 407, 1892 Tex. App. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-pacific-railway-co-v-shipman-texapp-1892.