Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Illig

20 Mo. App. 327, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 387
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 19, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Rombauer, J.,

delivered the opinion of tlie court.

Appellant is guilty of a non-compliance with, rule fifteen of this court. He has filed neither statement nor brief as thereby required. The rule makes it discretionary with the court, either to dismiss the appeal in such cases, or to continue or re-set the case on proper terms. We have examined the record and- find no substantial merits in the appeal. It results that a proper exercise of our discretion demands a dismissal of the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Illig, 20 Mo. App. 327, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 387 (Mo. Ct. App. 1886).

20 Mo. App. 327 (Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Illig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Desmornes v. Desmornes
12 P.R. 125 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1907)