Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago & Alton Railroad
This text of 132 U.S. 191 (Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago & Alton Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this action, tried by the Circuit Court without a jury, there is' no case stated by the parties, or finding of facts by the court. The bill of exceptions, after setting forth all the evidence introduced at the trial, states that “there were no declarations of law asked for, or given by the court;” and the single exception taken is to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, which is a matter of discretion, and not a subject of exception, according to the practice of the courts of the United States. In regard to motions for a new trial, and bills of exceptions, those courts are independent of any statute or practice prevailing in the courts of the State in which the [192]*192trial is had. Indianapolis Railroad v. Horst, 93 U. S. 291; Newcomb v. Wood, 97 U. S. 581; Chateaugay Iron Co., Petitioner, 128 U. S. 544.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 U.S. 191, 33 L. Ed. 309, 10 S. Ct. 65, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-pacific-railway-co-v-chicago-alton-railroad-scotus-1889.