Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hanna

266 U.S. 184, 45 S. Ct. 36, 69 L. Ed. 235, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2911
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 17, 1924·No. 54·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice McReynolds

delivered the opinion of the Court.

When this writ was granted, we, of course, supposed petitioner had properly raised and relied upon the indicated federal question in the courts below by claiming that its responsibility for injuries sustained by respondent while traveling on an interstate drover’s pass depended upon acts of Congress and applicable principles of common law as interpreted and applied by the federal courts. Southern Express Co. v. Byers, 240 U. S. 612, 614.

The record fails to disclose that it definitely raised the point in either trial or supreme court. On the contrary, it was there insisted that liability should be determined under the laws of Illinois, the State wherein the accident occurred.

The writ is accordingly

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hanna, 266 U.S. 184, 45 S. Ct. 36, 69 L. Ed. 235, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2911 (1924).

266 U.S. 184 (Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woods v. French, Shriner & Urner
4 F.2d 711 (W.D. Washington, 1925)
Ferries Co. v. United States
266 U.S. 260 (Supreme Court, 1924)