Missouri Pacific R. R. v. Nebraska State Ry. Comm'n
278 U.S. 569, 73 L. Ed. 511, 49 S. Ct. 81, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 355
Opinion
The writ of error is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question, on the authority of St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. v. Sheppard, 240 U. S. 240; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry., 228 U. S. 326.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Missouri Pacific R. R. v. Nebraska State Ry. Comm'n, 278 U.S. 569, 73 L. Ed. 511, 49 S. Ct. 81, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 355 (1928).
278 U.S. 569 (Missouri Pacific R. R. v. Nebraska State Ry. Comm'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacoby v. South Carolina State Board of Naturopathic Examiners
64 S.E.2d 138 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)