Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

33 F. 361, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 F. 862

Opinion

Pardee, J.

The intervention is a claim for damages caused by a fire originating from the railway locomotives operated by the receivers. The evidence proves the cause of the fire as alleged by the intervenor, and the damages as allowed b)7 the master, and there is no evidence in the record to rebut the presümption of negligence. If this class of fire claims are to be resisted by the receivers, their attention is called to the case of Railroad Co. v. Benson, 5 S. W. Rep. 822.

Let the exceptions be overruled, and the report be confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co., 33 F. 361, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2227 (circtedla 1888).

33 F. 361 (Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Benson
5 S.W. 822 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)