Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Stafford

35 S.W. 48, 13 Tex. Civ. App. 192, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 39
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 5, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 S.W. 48 (Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Stafford, 35 S.W. 48, 13 Tex. Civ. App. 192, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 39 (Tex. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

*193 PLEASANT, Associate Justice.

— The statement of facts, upon motion of appellees, having been stricken from the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It is insisted by appellant that the errors pointed out under the assignments are, some of them, patent upon the face of the record, and that others are made apparent when considered in connection with the bills of exceptions. This may be conceded, and yet, without a statement of facts, this court cannot say that the judgment is such as should not have been rendered. When the appellate court has before it a complete transcript of the proceedings of the lowei court, and it is shown therefrom that the court erred in the trial of the cause, the appellant is entitled to a reversal of the judgment, unless it is manifest that the error was harmless, and that, upon the facts, as de veloped upon the trial, and the pleadings, no other judgment than tie one appealed from could have been correctly rendered. But the reven e of this is the rule in this court when the transcript contains no statement of facts. In such case, unless the errors complained of are shown to have worked injury to the appellant, the judgment will be affirmed

Affirmed.

Writ of error refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Insurance v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
107 N.W. 548 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.W. 48, 13 Tex. Civ. App. 192, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-kansas-texas-railway-co-v-stafford-texapp-1896.