Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Fithian

85 P. 594, 73 Kan. 784, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 334
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedMay 12, 1906
DocketNo. 14,587
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 85 P. 594 (Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Fithian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Fithian, 85 P. 594, 73 Kan. 784, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 334 (kan 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

An ice-house was burned through the negligence of the employees of the railway company, who were burning and clearing the right of way. It was not an accidental fire, but was purposely set out under orders of a foreman and to carry out the company’s scheme of clearing the right of way and protecting it against loss. The fire was set out just beyond the right of way and within a few feet of the ice-house, but the company cannot escape liability on that account. Because of the direction of the wind the men thought it to be more practicable to burn from the outside toward the railroad-track, instead of from the track outward, but it proved to be a careless and disastrous plan. The fire was started near the right of way by employees of the company, under orders of its representative, and for its own benefit. For their negligence the company is responsible.

The question of contributory negligence was properly submitted to and settled by the jury. We find no error in the instructions, or other rulings, and therefore the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramsey v. Hand
357 P.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1960)
Miller v. Hand
356 P.2d 837 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1960)
Tafarella v. Hand
347 P.2d 356 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1959)
Stock v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
331 P.2d 549 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1958)
State v. Hess
289 P.2d 759 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1955)
Smith v. Smith
251 P.2d 720 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Gaston v. Collins
72 P.2d 84 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)
Overlander v. Overlander
268 P. 828 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1928)
State v. Turlock
248 P. 169 (Montana Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Turlok
248 P. 169 (Montana Supreme Court, 1926)
Amis v. Valerius
235 P. 833 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)
Ranchmen's Trust Co. v. Jesse
227 P. 255 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1924)
State v. Cruse
212 P. 81 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)
State ex rel. Brown v. Lyons
189 P. 976 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1920)
Stone v. Pugh
160 P. 988 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
Calhoun v. Anderson
98 P. 274 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1908)
Peabody v. Meacham
95 P. 322 (Washington Supreme Court, 1908)
United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Morrison
92 P. 1114 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1907)
State v. Curry
87 P. 745 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 P. 594, 73 Kan. 784, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-kansas-texas-railway-co-v-fithian-kan-1906.