Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Wallach

892 S.W.2d 806, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 1995 WL 45876
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 1995·No. No. 65314·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Appellants, owners of property appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict which awarded them $35,000 damages for land taken by the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission. We affirm.

In their sole point on appeal, property owners contend the trial court erroneously sustained the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission’s objection during closing argument. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find the [807]*807claim of error is without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Wallach, 892 S.W.2d 806, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 1995 WL 45876 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

892 S.W.2d 806 (Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Wallach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.