Home/Supreme Court/Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Harris

Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Harris

144 U.S. 210, 12 S. Ct. 838, 36 L. Ed. 407, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2072
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 4, 1892
Docket256
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 144 U.S. 210 (Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Harris, 144 U.S. 210, 12 S. Ct. 838, 36 L. Ed. 407, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2072 (1892).

Opinion

The Chief Justice :

The writ of error is dismissed because no Federal question is involved, upon the authority, among other cases, of Railroad Co. v. Rock, 4 Wall. 177, 181; Lehigh Water Co. v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388; N. O. Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co., 125 U. S. 18, 30; and Railroad Co. v. Todd County, 142 U. S. 282.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Keyes
186 So. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Citizens' St. R. v. City Ry. Co.
56 F. 746 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1893)
State Ex Rel. Quincy, M. & P. R. Co. v. Harris , Judges
144 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 U.S. 210, 12 S. Ct. 838, 36 L. Ed. 407, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-ex-rel-quincy-missouri-pacific-railroad-v-harris-scotus-1892.