Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Harris
144 U.S. 210, 12 S. Ct. 838, 36 L. Ed. 407, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2072
Opinion
The writ of error is dismissed because no Federal question is involved, upon the authority, among other cases, of Railroad Co. v. Rock, 4 Wall. 177, 181; Lehigh Water Co. v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388; N. O. Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co., 125 U. S. 18, 30; and Railroad Co. v. Todd County, 142 U. S. 282.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Harris, 144 U.S. 210, 12 S. Ct. 838, 36 L. Ed. 407, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2072 (1892).
144 U.S. 210 (Missouri Ex Rel. Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Keyes
186 So. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Citizens' St. R. v. City Ry. Co.
56 F. 746 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1893)
State Ex Rel. Quincy, M. & P. R. Co. v. Harris , Judges
144 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1892)