Missouri Board of Healing Arts v. Diering
This text of 285 S.W.3d 836 (Missouri Board of Healing Arts v. Diering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Board of Healing Arts (“the Board”) appeals the judgment of the Administrative Hearing Commission (“the *837 AHC”) granting Scott Diering an unrestricted temporary license. The Board contends that the AHC misinterpreted Section 334.100.2(1), arguing that the AHC should have applied a broad interpretation of the statute. This court finds no error in the AHC’s judgment. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 S.W.3d 836, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 988, 2009 WL 1851122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-board-of-healing-arts-v-diering-moctapp-2009.